Buy Turn Clicks Into CustomersBuy Turn Clicks Into CustomersBuy Turn Clicks Into Customers
Books written by Duane Forrester
Buy How To Make Money With Your BlogBuy How To Make Money With Your BlogBuy How To Make Money With Your Blog

 


Entries Tagged as 'Google'

Google will save the US economy

Well, the two big news stories involving Google this week have certainly made headlines. The move to beef up visual search and the algorithmic change to showcase big brands on most of page 1 of select SERPs caught a lot of attention for GOOG. I’m going to attempt to add some critical thinking to the discussions here. I can see upsides and downsides like most, but I’ll do my best to keep an even keel and divine a useful path forward for readers.

By now most folks have heard that Google has made a change to their algorithm which allows the SERP page to display one domain across most-to-all of the organic results shown.

Without going into too much detail, I’m going to drop these links on recent conversations and articles to get you up to speed if you missed this tidbit of recent news:

  • Google now showing 3 or more results from one domain
  • Is Google allowing multiple results for one domain in SERP?
  • Is Google treating brands as Site: queries?
  • Webmasterworld thread on this topic from early spotters
  • Small Sphinn discussion - GrowMap raises interesting points
  • After having a few days to watch this new change in action, and to test various phrases to see what results are returned, I’m left with a couple thoughts:

  • This is, as others have mentioned, obviously limited to very select, brand-related searches. I mean, if you type in Apple, and you’re from planet Earth, there is an excellent chance the results returned will match your intent. Better still, with multiple matches to choose from, this potentially reduces the refinement searches that often follow a searchers first query (an average of 3/4 more refinement searches usually follow). If you can deduce that a searcher looking for Apple wants something from Apple, Inc., you’re much closer to making them happy with an increased result set such as we now see. You cut down on wasted time on the searchers end, you cut down on your own resource load, you get the searcher the end result faster and they are happier.

    As the brand itself, you should be watching for increased inbound referral from search. Gone are the days of simply thinking you’ll rank well for your brand as we used to see. Sure, you’re still number one, but now the hunt is on to refine those extra results Google is showing. How best to capture higher converting traffic by optimizing select pages against phrases should now be in your playbook.

  • Not all branded searches are seeing this effect. Apple is seeing it, but Jeep is not. Jeep still nets the same top 2 results from the manufacturer that have been there for years, not a full page spread such as Google is lavishing on Apple, Inc. Why might his be? Could be that Jeep, as a brand, has a very active lifestyle built around it. I don’t mean active as in fit, I mean active as in populous and involved. From Jeep Jamborees to forums and localized clubs, Jeep is much closer to kleenex than is Apple. Let’s face it, most folks say Jeep when they think of a four wheel drive SUV. Comparably fewer folks say Apple when they mean computer… And I think this is helping Google see a pattern of traffic on phrases that differentiates these two big brands.

    Given the access to patterned data the engines have, they can easily understand the percentiles involved when a query such as Apple pops up. That data allows them to gamble a bit more confidently that the searcher wants the Apple, Inc. website, as opposed to information on a piece of fruit.

  • Currently, this all leads me to believe that this change, while beneficial to the brands affected, will have less down-side affect on other websites. I mean, you haven’t built your organic keyword strategy around targeting your competitors brand have you? If yes, then you well may be impacted greatly - and I have to say, this was not a wise course to chart in the first place, now, was it?

    I think the big brands will see more brand-related traffic coming to them, which is reasonable, given it IS their brand. This will also serve as a bit of a flag for smaller and emerging brands - if you see a full page of results around YOUR brand, it’s an indication Google feels you’ve “reached the big time”. Could this be an actual, track-able metric for brand awareness online? Well, maybe not really, but still, if you’re using rank tracking as a reportable metric, you might as well slip this one into the bunch as well and hang your hat on it. (If you cannot tell, I’m not a fan of rank as a metric… ;) )

    Now, before the whole industry spins out of control bemoaning this change, again, I’ll suggest folks relax and have a beer. Here’s what struck me last night as I drifted off to sleep (yes, I dream about search, too)…

    I was once told the percentage breakdown of clicks on SERP results went something like this. Please understand, this data was from a third party source (I trust him, he’s industry, successful, and well known). It was not meant to be absolute and I’m rounding things off a bit here. In practice, as your WMT accounts will show, the actual figures vary greatly based on actual keywords, so an average such as I’m presently is more for illustration, than action. I’ll also state this plainly: This is NOT Bing data. So here goes…

    Page 1 of SERPs

  • 1st - 40%
  • 2nd - 18%
  • 3rd - 12%
  • 4th - 8%
  • 5th - 7%
  • 6th - 4%
  • 7th - 3%
  • 8th - 2%
  • 9th - 1%
  • 10th - 1%
  • Page 2 of SERPs

  • 11th - 12%
  • 12th - 9%
  • …and so on down to lower percentages again…
  • Now, if we assume this data hold even an ounce of water, how does the new brand-centric shift in Google’s results affect things? Well, if those non-brand results on the first SERP page are shifted lower, then those still-useful and relevant results will begin to occupy territory usually thought of as being of secondary value - namely, the second and third SERP pages. This shift could manifest in changes to the CTRs we see on page 2 & 3 of the SERPs in fact. As users become accustomed to the brand-first display, there is a chance they’ll actively seek out the 2nd page with its variety of results. This could see users shift value to these results, effectively driving UP CTR on the 2nd and, potentially, 3rd SERP pages. Now, this is all speculative, of course. In the bigger picture, the brands will absorb more traffic originally intent on finding them, but for those on the fringes seeking conversions, this *could* signal a new form of filtering, rendering “better value searchers” making it through to the 2nd and 3rd SERP pages..

    If a user seeks results beyond the first page actively, they must be more intent on seeking a result, else the first page results would have captured them. We should be asking, if they were willing to work harder to find the desired result, are they more likely to convert when they reach that desired result? They’ve already demonstrated an intent to seek data further than most searchers. Will this translate to those searchers being viewed as more valued? Will this “filtering” result in more conversion-oriented searchers being found on the 2nd and 3rd SERP pages now?

    I find this line of thinking is highly intriguing…you can feel free to label me a nutter. ;)

    On the topic of visual search for a minute now, before I wrap up, I think it’s about time Google got with it. Bing’s release of their excellent visual search functionality earlier this year heralded a new direction for the major engines (disclosure: I work for Microsoft.). Images have long been a popular form of search, but using that area to actually search for things was a bit hit or miss at the engines until Bing rolled out their new space.

    Now, with Google’s purchase of Like.com to add muscle to their own visual product search space, we’re going to truly see a shift in user interaction. Now searchers will virtually window shop for popular products, allowing them to interact with richly detailed images to see the potential purchase from all angles prior to placing it in the cart. Clearly visual search will play a much bigger role in online shopping in the future. Why else would these two huge companies (MSFT & GOOG) invest so heavily in it?

    No matter how you cut it, though, the world has shifted. How much remains to be seen, but you can count on one thing that’s for sure…

    This timing is directly aimed at lining up big-brand & product searches in time for this upcoming holiday season. With the effects of algorithmic changes needing weeks to months to be fully felt, this organic release slots in perfectly to help big brands potentially post record breaking sales figures this coming Black Friday. Add in the effects of introducing a dramatically improved product search space and the overall result could be huge for all involved.

    Maybe these changes are less about relevance and more about saving the economy? THAT kind of PR would certainly help GOOG adhere to their ethos of doing no evil. With so many bemoaning this algorithmic shift and nay-saying, perhaps they simply need to take a bigger view to understand Google is truly out to save the country…

    OK, OK, I’ll take off my tin-foil hat now… LOL

    Still, if this shift drives online sales volumes higher, one thing I’ll be thankful for this fall is the huge investment that continues in the world of search. :)

    Sphere: Related Content

    Bing enables Google Keyword research tool?

    To be clear, Bing does not enable the Google keyword research tool. Though you could be forgiven for making such a case today. A friend captured this screen shot and sent it to me this morning. He went to Google’s tool to perform some keyword research, and guess what he got as the captchya prompt? Yep, the following…

    google keyword tool captchya

    I suppose it had to happen eventually, though I’m grateful he snagged a copy and sent the screenshot my way. maybe it’ll be a new sport - spot the online brand name in the captchyas…LOL

    …and no, it’s not a photoshop - things like this do happen as the captchya pulls from english language words…

    Sphere: Related Content

    Google Earth has a hidden Flight Simulator

    Very cool. I read this yesterday over at www.searchengineland.com.

    It’s a super cool hidden feature in the new Google Earth that was recently found.

    Apparently there’s a flight simulator buried in there. Here are some YouTube videos:

    Love the music with this next one!

    I think this one might be an integration between Google Earth and FS2004…


    Sphere: Related Content

    Get Adsense in password protected areas now

    Google just posted up on their Adsense blog that there is a new feature called site authentication.

    The gist of it is that this feature will allow you to set up a user name and password for the Adsense robot.

    It can then go in and crawl your password protected pages (much like a registered user) and thus begin showing relevant ads.

    This overcomes a major hurdle for many webmasters. Those operating forums can breathe easy now as they can keep their spaces locked down (for whatever reason they choose to do so) and still be assured that relevant ads are being shown to users.

    In fact, many sites may see an increase in CTRs as a result of a captive audience now seeing very targeted ads.

    This move is a positive one as it shows Google is listening to the needs expressed by Webmasters and doing something to help them achieve their revenue goals. In the larger picture, it also acknowledges the extent to which password protected spaces have grown. Google wouldn’t be doing this if it wasn’t in THEIR best interest as well. They now have expanded their advertising exposure reach into all those previously dark nooks and crannies folks have locked down.

    So, if you’re a Webmaster with anything questionable behind the locked door, better do some cleaning before setting this feature up. No worries, though, because if you don’t expressly set it up and activate it, the spiders stay out as usual… ;)

    Good move Google.

    Sphere: Related Content

    Flash and search optimization (SEO) - some guidelines

    This is still a hot topic these days, despite what we already know:

    Spiders don’t really crawl Flash thoroughly.

    Flash is seen by many as the indicator of a professional website. Basically, if the site is nice, looks cool and has fancy navigation options - if the company invested lots of money in their site - they must be a good company. Hopefully most people are starting to clue into the fact that this just isn’t so.

    In fact, many businesses online rely on a fancy website to cover up for the fact that they are just a coupe of guys looking to make some money online. Fancy site means a real company, and they use this to their advantage.

    But, for those who are serious about business online, the debate over to Flash or not to Flash breaks down along different lines.

    Do you use Flash to offer a better user experience? Is it used to showcase a particular product or service in a unique way?

    It’s easy to get carried away and end up with a killer website built entirely in Flash. The downside being they don’t tend to perform well in the search world. Like most things, your mileage may vary, as I’m sure there are some success stories of sites that are built with Flash doing very well indeed.

    By and large, though, most people tend to ask how to optimize a Flash website to do better in organic search rankings, so the trend is as we understand it - Flash sites struggle. And for good reason. Google’s Webmaster Central blog recently had an article on this topic and it’s worth a read - here’s a snippet:

    “As many of you already know, Flash is inherently a visual medium, and Googlebot doesn’t have eyes. Googlebot can typically read Flash files and extract the text and links in them, but the structure and context are missing. Moreover, textual contents are sometimes stored in Flash as graphics, and since Googlebot doesn’t currently have the algorithmic eyes needed to read these graphics, these important keywords can be missed entirely. All of this means that even if your Flash content is in our index, it might be missing some text, content, or links. Worse, while Googlebot can understand some Flash files, not all Internet spiders can.”

    The bottom line remains the same - don’t bury critical information inside Flash files. Things like navigation, sitemap data and actual content needs to be seen by the spiders so they can not only see links, but determine context. Without this holistic view, the engines are flying blind. Help them, and yourself, at the same time.

    Sphere: Related Content

    New York Times article on Google - excellent insights

    I was sent this link earlier today:

    NYT article on Google

    It’s a bit of a long read, but well worth it. It offers some insight into a lot of areas that are off limits to the general public. The paper was recently allowed to spend a day with the quality team - the group that Matt Cutts is a part of - to attend meetings, watch them work and generally get the feel for a “day in the life of’, if you will.

    The really interest in this article, however, are the small insights and things we may be able to infer about Google’s algorithm.

    Take Google Trends, for example. It’s basically new to most of us, yet it’s thinking has been used to help sort SERPs for a while now.

    There’s more, and that’s why the article is worth reading. Enjoy!

    Sphere: Related Content

    Google Trends in the SERPs

    If I remember correctly, Google does it’s best to keep results pages out of the SERPs. This is why we don’t see loads of links to other SERPs pages in the search results.

    They’ve segregated the news items to their own space slightly above the search results, and ads go where ads go.

    With the recent launch of Google trends, one might think that since it’s a Google item, it may be precluded form entering into the overall pool and thus wouldn’t show up in the SERPs. So, far, that’s not the case. Here’s an example passed to me by a friend this morning.

    google trends showing in serps

    Not sure if what we’re seeing is the normal way things will be, or just an anomaly as the algorithm is told what to do. Regardless, Google items are showing the Google search results.

    While this is not a major problem, some may feel it’s credibility killer. For the moment, at least, there don’t seem to be any ads showing alongside Google’s results, but that’s most likely a result of the topic being new and fleeting, so no one has created ads to chase it. If Google were actively disabling ads on pages where their own items showed in search results, well, that could be a major issue for advertisers.

    Sphere: Related Content

    Microsoft to buy Doubleclick? Google yawns, hits copy

    OK, so the WSJ is saying that Doubleclick might be on the block for 2 billion. No biggie, right?

    Well, who do we all know with pockets deep enough to handle that purchase and still have change for parking? Microsoft.

    Makes sense, sort of.

    If Microsoft buys Doubleclick, they’ll be one of, if not THE, largest providers of ad serving services in the world - to say nothing of network opportunities. You’d htink this might make Google quiver a bit - right?

    Nope - see, it appears they are planing (unofficially) to make a carbon copy of the Doubleclick system for themselves. No details have resolved around all this, but the possibilities are interesting.

    OK, so back to the point. We have this MS + DC beast lurking about, massive in size and it’s about to do…what , exactly?

    Serve ads? Cool - but where? Doesn’t matter, as something that size will create it’s own gravity.

    But, will it slow G down? Likely not. The critical problem that Microsoft tends to have is that it does big business very well and it does some entry level stuff rather well, but really does nothing to focus on the bulk of the space - in the middle. So, companies stuck in the “mid-size” category find solace with Google’s offerings. Easy to use, robust, low-to-no cost - they’ve built their image on this stuff.

    The other rather significant missing item in the puzzle for MS is market share. Google has it, MS wants it. Buying Doubleclick isn’t goign to make Microsoft any better at search, nor will it increase their market share in search.

    It could have a positive impact on revenue, but if ever there was one company in history that wasn’t at a loss for funding, it’s Microsoft.

    The whole thing is still an interesting idea…but I like the one where MS buys Yahoo better… ;)

    Sphere: Related Content

    Make Money with Adsense - some tips

    I’ve got my own list of Adsense tips in other pages here, but today I came across a link to a kick-a$$ Adsense resource, so I’m sharing it.

    Many points are NOT startling, but even those already making money might benefit by way of review. For those new to the game, between this info and the Google Heatmap, it’s a powerful combo to get you set up correctly.

    After that, it comes down to traffic - which is all up to you and your marketing abilities.

    Sphere: Related Content

    Google and BMW: Fast and accurate

    OK, do you recall the ruckus many, many months ago when Google.de booted BMW’s website from it’s listings? Something to do with the tactics the marketing agency was using, etc., etc.

    And Google not liking the redirecting that was going on, so BMW’s site was given the boot for a bit.

    Yeah, we all recall it. It seemed to stand out to some as a “watershed” moment of Google making an example of a well-known brand. Never struck me a such. Just the math being crunched and results tabulated leading to changes in the rankings - same stuff we see every day.

    But, as the cliche goes, I digress…

    Today, it seems, love is in the air. So much so, that the two companies have partnered up to offer Google Map assisted navigation.

    Nice to see BMW doesn’t hold a grudge.

    …or are they just using to the technology to ensure their hydrogen-power car (bomb?) reaches the correct address if they desire some “pay-back”…?

    Snippet from Google’s Blog:

    On the Google Maps team, our goal is not only to help you find local businesses, but also to enable you to quickly connect with those businesses, wherever you are. To that end, we recently introduced the ability to call businesses in the U.S. directly from Google Maps, and, as of today, users in Germany can send a business listing found on Google Maps Deutschland directly to cars enabled with the BMW Assist service. Drivers can then set it as the destination for the in-car navigation system, or they can call the business from within the car.

    Full story

    And here’s the promotional video they’re offering up to explain it all…

    German Version

    …and the vid is perfect.

    The business man is so snappy sending the info to his “economy” level 2-series hatch (chosen, no doubt, to connect with the masses); he patiently uses the iDrive system to call up the info and diligently puts on his seatbelt and hits the start button while waiting for the info to load into the high-end sat/nav system the little entry-level wagon happens to have.

    Heck, the vid even ends just-so when he meets the gorgeous blond lady on time and in the right place - good for them!

    Now, if we could just get this in a car I can access AND afford

    Sphere: Related Content

    The Book Store

    Target Your Competition

    Raven Tools SEO Tools

    Press Release Distribution 24-7PressRelease.com